drivebasevsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drivebase | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 34 in File Management | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 594 | 12 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 51/100 for drivebase, so it is the safer default.
drivebase ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, drivebase is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
drivebase details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep drivebase, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with