drivevsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drive | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 481 | 65 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +315 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.25.3 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 49/100 for drive, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; drive needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
drive details →nocodb details →