draw.iovsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| draw.io | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Diagramming | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 9 050 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +718 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 44 | 0 |
| Latest release | v32.6.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
draw.io scores 73/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
draw.io ships more often: 44 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, draw.io is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
draw.io is growing faster right now (+718 stars in 30 days).
draw.io details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep draw.io, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with