DozzlevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dozzle | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Log Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 755 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +281 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 6 |
| Latest release | v11.3.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Dozzle scores 77/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Dozzle ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Dozzle is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Dozzle is growing faster right now (+281 stars in 30 days).
Dozzle details →Tube Archivist details →