DonetickvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Donetick | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 34 in Task Management | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 2 688 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.1.83 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Donetick scores 63/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Donetick ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Donetick is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
Donetick is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).
Donetick details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep Donetick, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with