DockerRegistryvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 10 666 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | v3.19.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with