DockerRegistryvsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
DockerRegistry ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; Print Farm Manager needs more configuration.
DockerRegistry is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →Print Farm Manager details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep Print Farm Manager, compare it with