DockerRegistryvsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 | 2 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.
open·kritt ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.
DockerRegistry is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →open·kritt details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep open·kritt, compare it with