DockerRegistryvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
DockerRegistry details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with