docker-pi-holevsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 31 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for docker-pi-hole.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+244 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with