docker-pi-holevsWireGuard Easy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | WireGuard Easy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 27 318 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +330 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 73/100 for WireGuard Easy, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; WireGuard Easy needs more configuration.
WireGuard Easy is growing faster right now (+330 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →WireGuard Easy details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep WireGuard Easy, compare it with