docker-pi-holevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 9 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with