corednsvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 14 400 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
coredns is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with