docker-pi-holevsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 11 729 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with