docker-pi-holevsPostal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Postal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 16 899 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 3.3.7 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 72/100 for Postal, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Postal.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Postal needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →Postal details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Postal, compare it with