docker-pi-holevsopenITCOCKPIT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | openITCOCKPIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #6 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 404 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | openITCOCKPIT-5.9.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 54/100 for openITCOCKPIT, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; openITCOCKPIT needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →openITCOCKPIT details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep openITCOCKPIT, compare it with