docker-pi-holevsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 730 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with