docker-pi-holevsJoplin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Joplin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 56 920 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +440 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Joplin details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Joplin, compare it with