docker-pi-holevsIPFS Web UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | IPFS Web UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 1 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →IPFS Web UI details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep IPFS Web UI, compare it with