docker-pi-holevsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 30 123 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +707 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 79 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+707 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Infisical details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Infisical, compare it with