InfisicalvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 30 109 | 61 541 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +710 | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical details →Pi-hole details →