docker-pi-holevsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 11 729 | 8 547 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →growthbook details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep growthbook, compare it with