corednsvsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 | 8 547 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
growthbook is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →growthbook details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep growthbook, compare it with