docker-mailservervsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-mailserver | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Mail Server | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 19 705 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +831 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 18 |
| Latest release | v16.0.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
docker-mailserver scores 80/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for docker-mailserver.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; docker-mailserver needs more configuration.
docker-mailserver is growing faster right now (+831 stars in 30 days).
docker-mailserver details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-mailserver, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with