docker-mailservervsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-mailserver | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Mail Server | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 19 705 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +831 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v16.0.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-mailserver scores 80/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
docker-mailserver ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; docker-mailserver needs more configuration.
docker-mailserver is growing faster right now (+831 stars in 30 days).
docker-mailserver details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-mailserver, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with