docker-mailservervsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-mailserver | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Mail Server | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 19 704 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +830 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v16.0.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-mailserver scores 80/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
docker-mailserver ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Traffic Source is easier to run; docker-mailserver needs more configuration.
docker-mailserver is growing faster right now (+830 stars in 30 days).
docker-mailserver details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-mailserver, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with