Docker EnginevsxBrowserSync
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Docker Engine | xBrowserSync | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #17 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 72 225 | 855 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +92 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Docker Engine scores 80/100 against 54/100 for xBrowserSync, so it is the safer default.
Docker Engine ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for xBrowserSync.
If you want the quickest setup, xBrowserSync is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.
Docker Engine is growing faster right now (+92 stars in 30 days).
Docker Engine details →xBrowserSync details →
Swap a project
Keep Docker Engine, compare it with
Keep xBrowserSync, compare it with