docker-ddnsvsmikrotik-dns
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-ddns | mikrotik-dns | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 31 in Networking | #40 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 672 | 136 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-ddns scores 47/100 against 40/100 for mikrotik-dns, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, mikrotik-dns is easier to run; docker-ddns needs more configuration.
docker-ddns details →mikrotik-dns details →