DispatcharrvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dispatcharr | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 4 421 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +306 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.33.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Dispatcharr scores 72/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Dispatcharr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Dispatcharr is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Dispatcharr is growing faster right now (+306 stars in 30 days).
Dispatcharr details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Dispatcharr, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with