DiscoursevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Discourse | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 48 028 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Discourse scores 83/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Discourse ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Discourse is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
Discourse details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →