Discoursevsstatusnook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Discourse | statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 48 028 | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Discourse scores 83/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
Discourse ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; Discourse needs more configuration.
Discourse is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
Discourse details →statusnook details →