DiscoursevsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Discourse | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 48 029 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | C |
Which one should you pick?
Discourse scores 83/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Discourse ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Discourse is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).
Discourse details →Qtap details →