DietPivsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DietPi | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Operating System | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 6 369 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v10.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
DietPi scores 71/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; DietPi needs more configuration.
DietPi is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
DietPi details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep DietPi, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with