qm-musicvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with