DesktopCommanderMCPvsZhikunCode
Two self-hosted Cursor alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DesktopCommanderMCP | ZhikunCode | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in LLM Integration | #34 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 10 154 | 532 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 21 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
DesktopCommanderMCP scores 73/100 against 51/100 for ZhikunCode, so it is the safer default.
DesktopCommanderMCP ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ZhikunCode.
If you want the quickest setup, DesktopCommanderMCP is easier to run; ZhikunCode needs more configuration.
DesktopCommanderMCP is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).
DesktopCommanderMCP details →ZhikunCode details → All Cursor alternatives →