deer-flowvsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 652 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 704 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 704 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →UmlautAdaptarr details →