deer-flowvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 84 611 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 663 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 663 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →Tube Archivist details →