deer-flowvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 84 615 | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 667 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 667 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →