deer-flowvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 574 | 23 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 | +1 002 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 22 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow details →Super Productivity details →