deer-flowvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 84 580 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 659 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 659 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →static_status details →