deer-flowvsSelf-Hosted Metrics (SHM)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 84 602 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 654 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 654 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →