deer-flowvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 84 583 | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 662 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, SandBase Harness is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 662 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →SandBase Harness details →All AI Agents projects →