deer-flowvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 84 652 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 704 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 704 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →retroassembly details →