DebNASvsdocker-pi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DebNAS | docker-pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 22 in Home Server | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 184 | 11 726 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 56/100 for DebNAS, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DebNAS.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; DebNAS needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
DebNAS details →docker-pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep DebNAS, compare it with
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with