daedalOSvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| daedalOS | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 13 076 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
daedalOS scores 72/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for daedalOS.
If you want the quickest setup, daedalOS is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
daedalOS is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).
daedalOS details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep daedalOS, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with