daedalOSvsstatusnook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| daedalOS | statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 13 078 | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
daedalOS scores 72/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; daedalOS needs more configuration.
daedalOS is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).
daedalOS details →statusnook details →
Swap a project
Keep daedalOS, compare it with
Keep statusnook, compare it with