d2c.shvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted DNS projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| d2c.sh | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 228 | 61 536 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +492 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 41/100 for d2c.sh, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for d2c.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, d2c.sh is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).
d2c.sh details →Pi-hole details →All DNS projects →
Swap a project
Keep d2c.sh, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with