AdGuard Homevsd2c.sh
Two self-hosted DNS projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | d2c.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #31 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 37 803 | 228 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +759 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 41/100 for d2c.sh, so it is the safer default.
AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for d2c.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, d2c.sh is easier to run; AdGuard Home needs more configuration.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+759 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →d2c.sh details →All DNS projects →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep d2c.sh, compare it with