cStatevsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cState | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 901 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 |
| Latest release | v7-r1 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 62/100 for cState, so it is the safer default.
WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for cState.
If you want the quickest setup, cState is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
cState details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep cState, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with