CryptPadvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CryptPad | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Office Suites | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 8 030 | 393 292 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +2 944 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 37 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 71/100 for CryptPad, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for CryptPad.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 944 stars in 30 days).
CryptPad details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep CryptPad, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with